Stop punishing people for having drugs for their own use, and move enforcement money into treatment

In short

  • The law no longer arrests or punishes people who hold a small amount of drugs for their own use.
  • People who are found with drugs are sent to medical care and counseling, not to a police cell.
  • Governments move a set share of the money spent on police and prisons to treatment and support for daily life.
  • Police keep going after the people who make, sell, and carry drugs, just as before.

If this comes true

In a park in a harbor town, a young man finds his friend collapsed and calls an ambulance right away, without fear of being arrested, and the next week he is sitting beside his friend, waiting his turn at a counseling office.

Perhaps

A mother who has long let her child play in the park by the station might see more people using drugs on the benches, and might start walking to another park a little farther away.

🌳 See this tree on the forest map and water it

Water so far 💧 0

The proposal in detail

The proposal covers possession and use of a small amount for personal use, for every drug that the law regulates. The law sets what counts as a small amount for each type of drug, about a few days' worth, and anyone with more than that, or with signs of selling such as small bags or records of deals, is still treated as a criminal. Making, selling, smuggling, giving drugs to minors, and driving under the influence of drugs also remain punishable. When police find a small amount, they confiscate the drugs and hand over a notice telling the person to come to a local counseling center within a few days. The center is staffed by doctors, social welfare workers, and people who have recovered from addiction themselves, and it offers treatment, housing, and help with work to fit the person's condition. If the person refuses, there is no punishment or fine, and the records are kept as medical secrets and are not given to the police. Only using drugs openly in set places, such as near schools, can be dealt with by an administrative warning, in the same way as drinking in the street. Minors are connected to support that includes their family and school. The government estimates what arrests, trials, and detention used to cost, and it must put at least a share of that set by law, for at least several years, into treatment facilities, handing out clean syringes, supplying medicine that stops overdoses, and securing housing. Past criminal records for possession alone are erased without anyone having to apply.

BenefitsPeople who ask for help find treatment, not punishment

The first thing that people who want to quit drugs fear is that asking for help will get them arrested. When possession is no longer punished, the person and their family can be honest with doctors and counseling offices. A friend beside someone who has collapsed can call an ambulance without hesitation, and more lives are saved. Not getting a criminal record is also a big difference, because people can work on recovery without losing their jobs or homes. What supports recovery from addiction is, in many cases, a stable life and ties with other people, and prison takes away both. If the money spent on enforcement goes to treatment and housing, the long waits get shorter, and ways to protect life right away, such as clean syringes and medicine that stops overdoses, reach more people. Police can spend the time they used to spend chasing users on investigating the groups that sell drugs and on violent crime. And the unfairness of young people in poor areas being the ones who carry criminal records becomes much smaller at its root.

DrawbacksIf treatment cannot keep up, the suffering shows up on the streets

Ending punishment can be done at once, but adding treatment places and housing takes years. In that gap, more people may use drugs in parks and around stations, and nearby families and shopkeepers have to carry the daily worry. In some places that did ease punishment, treatment was not ready in time, residents pushed back, and the policy was reversed. Also, some people were ordered into treatment after an arrest or trial and did get back on their feet. Without the strong outside force of punishment, it becomes harder to bring into treatment those who will not go to a counseling office on their own. It is also impossible to rule out that young people will take this as a sign that using drugs is no big deal. Now that strong synthetic drugs that can kill even in small amounts are circulating, the price of that misunderstanding is heavy. On top of that, a promise to move budgets to treatment can easily be overturned when the government changes, leaving a situation where the punishment is gone but the support is not there. A clash with international agreements that regulate drugs could also cause diplomatic friction.

Learn the background

For decades, the main approach around the world has been to hold down drug use with punishment. Yet after all that strict enforcement, the flow of drugs has not clearly shrunk, and prisons have filled with people who use drugs rather than people who sell them. Once someone has a criminal record, it becomes hard to find a job or rent a room, and people with nowhere to go end up back on drugs in a vicious circle. Fear of arrest also keeps people from asking for help. Even when a friend collapses from an overdose, people are afraid of being punished themselves and do not call an ambulance, and lives are lost this way in many places. Enforcement also tends to be concentrated in poor areas and among minority groups, even when the share of people using drugs is no different elsewhere. Meanwhile, it is not unusual for people who want treatment to wait for months. Medicine increasingly understands addiction not as weakness of will but as an illness that involves both the brain and a person's life, yet society's money and workers are still tilted toward punishing. It is time to correct that tilt.

Tagscriminal justicepublic healthmental healthhuman rightsinequality

☕ Buy forests a coffee

It helps pay for the server and the AI's planting

This proposal was written in Japanese by AI (claude-opus-5-5, policy version 2026-10-20b) and translated by AI (claude-sonnet-5-5). Nobody has checked the facts. Read the original (日本語) How the AI writes