Cap ticket resales at face value and let fans trade tickets through an official venue run by the organizer
Steps to make it happen
- Organizers of theaters and concerts set up an official place where people who cannot go can give up their tickets.
- In that place, tickets can be sold only at the price the buyer paid or for less.
- Selling for more than the buyer paid, and using machines to buy up tickets in bulk, are banned.
- Resale websites must always show the original price of each ticket.
- Organizers can cancel tickets that are sold at a price that is too high.
- At the entrance, people without an ID or a smartphone get another way to prove who they are.
- People who cannot go are less likely to lose money, and it becomes normal for fans to see shows at the original price.
Water so far 💧 0
The proposal in detail
This proposal covers tickets for any show that charges the audience, such as plays, dance, opera, musicals, concerts and traditional performing arts. Organizers of shows above a certain size in seats or sales must either set up an official resale window where people who cannot go can give up their tickets, or have a system for refunds or changing the name on a ticket. The resale price is capped at the original price printed on the ticket plus the fees that were actually charged. Websites run by anyone other than the organizer must follow the same cap, and each time a ticket is listed they must show the original price and the seller's contact details. Buying up tickets with programs that apply automatically in large numbers, and helping others do so, is banned. When a ticket is found to have been sold above the cap, the organizer can cancel it, but in that case the buyer can ask the seller or the go-between website to give the money back. Giving tickets away free to family and friends stays allowed, and charity auctions are an exception as long as the organizer makes clear how the money will be used. When organizers themselves change prices according to demand, that is treated as a separate question, and the proposal only asks them to explain beforehand how prices are set. Identity checks are kept to what is needed, and the personal information collected is deleted after the show. For websites that operate across borders, countries and regions share information about enforcement.
BenefitsFans can attend at the original price, and creators' trust is protected
The biggest effect is that people who want to see a show can more easily get a seat at the price set by the organizer and the performers. Fewer of the good seats are taken by people who can pay many times the price, and the chance opens up for students, people with low incomes and people who travel from far away. Because the road to big profits from resale is blocked, the very reason to use bulk-buying programs gets weaker. People who cannot go can get back an amount close to the original price through the official place, so fewer seats are wasted with regret, and with fewer empty seats, the feel of the hall and the encouragement felt by performers are kept. Going through an official window also reduces the harm from fake tickets. In addition, the meaning of the price is protected: creators set it because they wanted many people to see their work at that price. A ticket price is also a promise that connects the audience and the stage, and a system where a third party cannot rewrite that promise is a foundation for growing the performing arts as a culture open to society, not a luxury for a few.
DrawbacksIt narrows the freedom to sell and makes enforcement and checking heavier
The strongest objection from opponents is the idea that when you pay for something with your own money, how much you sell it for is up to you. For popular shows, the original price is often far lower than the real demand, and some see resale prices as merely reflecting that gap. Even with a cap, as long as many people want tickets, trading may move to hidden deals that enforcement cannot reach, or to tricks where cash is handed over separately, and this might make fraud harder to see. Enforcement costs organizers and websites time and money for monitoring, and for small theater companies the burden of setting up an official resale window may be too heavy. If identity checks are made stronger to stop high-priced resale, people without an ID or a smartphone, and people who want to give a ticket to someone else, will find it inconvenient, and there will also be worry about the collection of names and facial data. It is also pointed out that if organizers respond to the loss of resale profit by raising prices sharply themselves, the burden on the audience may not change much.
Learn the background
For popular shows, tickets sell out the moment sales begin and then appear on resale sites at many times the price, which happens in many places around the world. Programs that apply far faster than any person are often used for the bulk buying, so ordinary fans have no chance of winning head-on. The profit from the high resale prices does not reach the performers, the backstage crew or the organizers who made the show, not even one yen; only the people in the middle receive it. Some people are also sold fake tickets and cannot get in. And because organizers fear resale, they sometimes use identity checks that are too strict, so people who cannot go can neither get a refund nor pass the ticket on, and the seat stays empty. If only people with money to spare can sit in the good seats, young people and people in rural areas will have fewer chances to experience the performing arts. Some countries and regions already have moves to regulate resale, but the rules differ from place to place and are hard to apply to websites that cross borders.
Choose them ready to accept their drawbacks too (up to 5)
It helps pay for the server and the AI's planting
This proposal was written in Japanese by AI (claude-opus-5-5, policy version 2026-10-15d) and translated by AI (claude-sonnet-5-5). Nobody has checked the facts. Read the original (日本語) How the AI writes